Comments for Aspiring Craftsman http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com pursuing well-crafted software Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:33:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Comment on Resharper Naming Style for Machine.Specifications by NullReference » Blog Archive » More MSpec – ReSharper love http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/02/resharper-naming-style-for-machine-specifications/comment-page-1/#comment-620 NullReference » Blog Archive » More MSpec – ReSharper love Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:33:11 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/?p=222#comment-620 [...] As everything always is done by someone before, I’m only going to give you a link to the solution: http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/02/resharper-naming-style-for-machine-specifications/ [...] [...] As everything always is done by someone before, I’m only going to give you a link to the solution: http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/02/resharper-naming-style-for-machine-specifications/ [...]

]]> Comment on Interactive Application Architecture Patterns by Unmesh Kondolikar http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2007/08/interactive-application-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-619 Unmesh Kondolikar Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:21:09 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2007/08/interactive-application-architecture-patterns/#comment-619 This is a definitive read on MVC and MVP. Thank you very much for a great article. This is a definitive read on MVC and MVP. Thank you very much for a great article.

]]> Comment on Double Dispatch is a Code Smell by Derek http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/04/double-dispatch-is-a-code-smell/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Derek Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:00:32 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/?p=330#comment-618 You're correct that the dynamic keyword introduced with C# 4.0 can be leveraged as an alternative to using the classic Double Dispatch pattern (which I point out in my article <a href="http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/04/the-agile-visitor/" rel="nofollow">The Agile Visitor</a>). Unfortunately, use of the dynamic keyword in this case doesn't address the underlying issue being discussed by this article. While the dynamic keyword may make it easier to code around OCP and SRP violations, doing so doesn't remove the potential consequences of such violations. You’re correct that the dynamic keyword introduced with C# 4.0 can be leveraged as an alternative to using the classic Double Dispatch pattern (which I point out in my article The Agile Visitor). Unfortunately, use of the dynamic keyword in this case doesn’t address the underlying issue being discussed by this article. While the dynamic keyword may make it easier to code around OCP and SRP violations, doing so doesn’t remove the potential consequences of such violations.

]]> Comment on Double Dispatch is a Code Smell by Siderite http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/04/double-dispatch-is-a-code-smell/comment-page-1/#comment-617 Siderite Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:41:15 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/?p=330#comment-617 There is a simple solution for avoiding the need for double dispatch in C# 4.0, and that is using the dynamic keyword. It might smell weird, but it does the job. In your surface example, all you have to do is replace shape.Draw(surface) with shape.Draw((dynamic)surface). More details here: <a>http://siderite.blogspot.com/2010/06/using-dynamic-keyword-to-select.html</a> There is a simple solution for avoiding the need for double dispatch in C# 4.0, and that is using the dynamic keyword. It might smell weird, but it does the job.
In your surface example, all you have to do is replace shape.Draw(surface) with shape.Draw((dynamic)surface).

More details here: http://siderite.blogspot.com/2010/06/using-dynamic-keyword-to-select.html

]]> Comment on Windows-Friendly Cygwin Paths by Matthew http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2010/07/windows-friendly-cygwin-paths/comment-page-1/#comment-616 Matthew Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:46:37 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/?p=383#comment-616 Thanks for this. It saved me trying to get a Rake script working! Thanks for this. It saved me trying to get a Rake script working!

]]> Comment on Enhancing the Prism Module Initialization Lifecycle by Software http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2009/05/enhancing-prism-module-initialization/comment-page-1/#comment-615 Software Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:01:53 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2009/05/enhancing-the-prism-module-initialization-lifecycle/#comment-615 Congratulations! You have just won a new feed reader :) .. really cool post, Mike. Congratulations! You have just won a new feed reader :) .. really cool post, Mike.

]]> Comment on Model View Presenter Styles by alberto http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2008/11/model-view-presenter-styles/comment-page-1/#comment-612 alberto Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:46:31 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2008/11/model-view-presenter-styles/#comment-612 Thanks!! great article!!! I'm my humble opinion the best variant it's the last one. Some years ago I hated to program the view. But I realise that I wasn't using the correct concepts for the job. And after read this great article I will enjoy it, for sure. Thanks!! great article!!!
I’m my humble opinion the best variant it’s the last one.
Some years ago I hated to program the view. But I
realise that I wasn’t using the correct concepts for
the job. And after read this great article I will enjoy
it, for sure.

]]> Comment on Convention-based Registration Extension for Unity by Nachiket Mehta http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2009/06/convention-based-registration-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Nachiket Mehta Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:18:14 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2009/06/convention-based-registration-extension-for-unity/#comment-611 This is awesome. I was thinking about writing an extension like this and found your article. This is awesome. I was thinking about writing an extension like this and found your article.

]]> Comment on Interactive Application Architecture Patterns by Pierre V. http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2007/08/interactive-application-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-608 Pierre V. Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:03:48 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2007/08/interactive-application-architecture-patterns/#comment-608 I spent the last week trying to wrap my head around MVC. Wow! This write-up just really made things clear. Nice job! I spent the last week trying to wrap my head around MVC. Wow! This write-up just really made things clear. Nice job!

]]> Comment on Convention-based Registration Extension for Unity by Derek http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2009/06/convention-based-registration-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-607 Derek Tue, 18 May 2010 16:06:50 +0000 http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2009/06/convention-based-registration-extension-for-unity/#comment-607 Thanks for submitting the patch Ryan. I cherry-picked a bit, but it was instrumental in understanding the issue. Thanks for submitting the patch Ryan. I cherry-picked a bit, but it was instrumental in understanding the issue.

]]>